[1] Almeida, R. O., Ramos, A., Kimiaei, E., Österberg, M., Maloney, T. C., and Gamelas, J. A., 2024. Improvement of the properties of nanocellulose suspensions and films by the presence of residual lignin. Cellulose, 31(18), pp.10951-10967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-06222-y.
[2] Balea, A., Monte, M. C., Fuente, E., Sanchez-Salvador, J. L., Tarrés, Q., Mutjé, P., and Negro, C., 2023. Fit-for-use nanofibrillated cellulose from recovered paper. Nanomaterials, 13(18), pp.1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13182536.
[3] Liu, W., Liu, K., Du, H., Zheng, T., Zhang, N., Xu, T., and Zhang, K., 2022. Cellulose nanopaper: fabrication, functionalization, and applications. Nano-Micro Letters, 14(1), pp.1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00849-x.
[4] Yousefhashemi, S. M., Khosravani, A., and Yousefi, H., 2019. Isolation of lignocellulose nanofiber from recycled old corrugated container and its interaction with cationic starch–nanosilica combination to make paperboard. Cellulose, 26(12), pp.7207-7221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02562-2.
[5] Dufresne, A., 2013. Nanocellulose: A new ageless bionanomaterial. Materials Today. 16(6), pp.220-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004.
[6] Desmaisons, J., Boutonnet, E., Rueff, M., Dufresne, A., and Bras, J., 2017. A new quality index for benchmarking of different cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydrate Polymers, 174, pp.318-329. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.032.
[7] Kangas, H., Lahtinen, P., Sneck, A., Saariaho, A. M., Laitinen, O., and Hellén, E., 2014. Characterization of fibrillated celluloses. A short review and evaluation of characteristics with a combination of methods. Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal, 29(1), pp.129-143. pp. 129-143. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2014-29-01-p129-143.
[8] Foster, E. J., Moon, R. J., Agarwal, U. P., Bortner, M. J., Bras, J., Camarero-Espinosa, S., and Youngblood, J., 2018. Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials. Chemical Society Reviews, 47(8), pp.2609-2679. https://doi.org/ 10.1039/c6cs00895j.
[9] Reid, M. S., Villalobos, M., and Cranston, E. D., 2017. Benchmarking cellulose nanocrystals: from the laboratory to industrial production. Langmuir, 33(7), pp.1583-1598. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765.
[10] Ahola, S., Salmi, J., Johansson, L. S., Laine, J., and Österberg, M., 2008. Model films from native cellulose nanofibrils. Preparation, swelling, and surface interactions. Biomacromolecules, 9(4), pp.1273-1282. https://doi.org/ 1273-1282. 10.1021/bm701317k CCC: $40.75.
[11] Naderi, A., Lindström, T., and Sundström, J., 2015. Repeated homogenization, a route for decreasing the energy consumption in the manufacturing process of carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose. 22(2), pp.1147-1157. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10570-015-0576-4.
[12] Espinosa, E., Domínguez-Robles, J., Sánchez, R., Tarrés, Q., and Rodríguez, A., 2017. The effect of pre-treatment on the production of lignocellulosic nanofibers and their application as a reinforcing agent in paper. Cellulose, 24(6), pp.2605-2618. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10570-017-1281-2.
[13] Mazega, A., Lehrhofer, A. F., Aguado, R. J., Potthast, A., Marquez, R., Rosenau, T., and Delgado-Aguilar, M., 2025. Key insights into TEMPO-mediated oxidation of cellulose: influence of starting material. Cellulose, 32, pp.5227–5246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-025-06477-z.
[14] Sanchez-Salvador, J. L., Campano, C., Balea, A., Tarrés, Q., Delgado-Aguilar, M., Mutjé, P., and Negro, C., 2022. Critical comparison of the properties of cellulose nanofibers produced from softwood and hardwood through enzymatic, chemical and mechanical processes. International journal of biological macromolecules, 205, pp.220-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.074.
[15] Signori-Iamin, G., Santos, A. F., Corazza, M. L., Aguado, R., Tarrés, Q., and Delgado-Aguilar, M., 2022. Prediction of cellulose micro/nanofiber aspect ratio and yield of nanofibrillation using machine learning techniques. Cellulose, 29(17), pp.9143-9162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04847-5.
[16] Segal, L. G. J. M. A., Creely, J. J., Martin Jr, A. E., and Conrad, C. M., 1959. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile research journal, 29(10), pp.786-794. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003.
[17] Liu, Y., Chen, B., Lv, Y., Ye, X., Lin, C., and Liu, M., 2022. Insight into the performance of lignin-containing cellulose nanofibers (LCNFs) via lignin content regulation by p-toluenesulfonic acid delignification. Cellulose, 29(4), pp.2273-2287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04432-w.
[18] Espinosa, E., Rol, F., Bras, J., and Rodríguez, A., 2020. Use of multi-factorial analysis to determine the quality of cellulose nanofibers: Effect of nanofibrillation treatment and residual lignin content. Cellulose, 27(18), pp.10689-10705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03136-3.
[19] Espinosa, E., Bascón-Villegas, I., Rosal, A., Pérez-Rodríguez, F., Chinga-Carrasco, G., and Rodríguez, A., 2019. PVA/(ligno) nanocellulose biocomposite films. Effect of residual lignin content on structural, mechanical, barrier and antioxidant properties. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 141, pp.197-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.262.
[20] Fu, H., Gao, W., Wang, B., Zeng, J., Cheng, Z., Xu, J., and Chen, K., 2020. Effect of lignin content on the microstructural characteristics of lignocellulose nanofibrils. Cellulose, 27(3), PP.1327-1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02859-2.
[21] Lovely, B., Kim, Y. T., Huang, H., Zink-Sharp, A., and Roman, M., 2025. Impacts of cycles of a novel low-pressure homogenization process on cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) as a sustainable packaging film material. Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications, 9, pp.1-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2025.100739.
