Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Industries

Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Industries

Analysis of the Competitive Structure of the Upholstered Furniture Industry in Tehran Province Using Porter’s Five Forces Model

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of wood and paper science and technology, University college of agriculture and natural resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
2 university of tehran
3 Department of Agricultural Economics, University college of agriculture and natural resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
4 Department of Bio Systems, Faculty of New Technologies and Aerospace Engineering, Zirab Campus, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/ijwp.2025.2067015.1717
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The upholstered furniture industry is one of the key sectors driving economic development and generating employment and added value in developing countries. In Iran, particularly in Tehran Province, this industry holds a special position due to the province's concentrated population, high demand levels, and convenient access to consumer markets. However, economic fluctuations and increasing competition among producers have highlighted the need to reassess competitive strategies and identify factors affecting competitive advantage. Accordingly, the present study aims to analyze the five competitive forces influencing the competitive advantage of the upholstered furniture industry in Tehran Province, employing Porter’s Five Forces model. This model is a well-established tool for analyzing market competitive structure, assessing five key factors: the threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of substitute products, and intensity of intra-industry rivalry. The novelty of this study lies in its geographical focus on the Tehran Province upholstered furniture industry, the application of a two-stage Delphi technique for refining the survey items, and the weighted prioritization of competitive forces based on local expert opinions, providing a more precise and localized depiction of the industry’s competitive structure.
Materials and Methods: This study adopted a descriptive-analytical approach and, in terms of purpose, is applied in nature. The research employed Porter’s Five Forces model to analyze forces affecting the competitive advantage of the industry. Initially, through a systematic review of the literature, items corresponding to each competitive force were identified, and after preliminary screening, a questionnaire was developed. Subsequently, a two-stage Delphi technique was implemented. In the first stage, 13 academic and industry experts with relevant expertise validated the items and suggested additional ones. In the second stage, the finalized questionnaire was distributed to 69 experts and industry practitioners between early February and late March 2025 in Tehran Province. The questionnaire, designed via the Parsline platform, collected demographic data (gender, education, age) and was disseminated through social media platforms (Telegram, Eitaa) to relevant professional associations. Responses were analyzed using SPSS version 26, and reliability was assessed via Cronbach’s alpha, yielding a value of 0.705, indicating acceptable measurement reliability.
Results: Data analysis revealed that among Porter’s five forces, the bargaining power of buyers and the intensity of competition among existing competitors had the greatest influence on the competitive structure of the Tehran Province upholstered furniture industry. High buyer sensitivity to factors such as price, quality, and design (mean > 3.4), along with social comparison behavior, indicates that producers must continuously understand and monitor customer needs and preferences to maintain competitive advantage. The high number of producers and the relative uniformity of product quality have created a non-monopolistic, competitive structure, with the “intensity of rivalry” item receiving one of the highest scores (mean = 4.4). Additionally, the threat of new entrants was considered significant (mean = 4.07) due to factors such as easy access to distribution networks and the potential for industry digitization, implying that new entrants could disrupt market balance. In contrast, the bargaining power of suppliers was evaluated at a moderate level (mean = 4.09), and due to the diversity of raw material suppliers, it does not pose a major threat. Finally, the threat of substitute products was the least influential factor; although alternatives such as royal or polymeric furniture may be considered substitutes under certain economic conditions, the mean propensity to substitute (4.1) is far lower than the decisive role of buyer power (4.8), indicating that consumer preference remains firmly oriented toward upholstered furniture.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that the “bargaining power of buyers” and the “intensity of competition among producers” are the two key determinants shaping the competitive advantage of Tehran Province’s upholstered furniture industry. Therefore, strategic focus on understanding consumer preferences, fostering design innovation, and establishing brand differentiation can facilitate sustainable competitiveness for producers in this industry.
Keywords

Subjects


 [1] Maleki, F., 2017. An investigation of the economic capacities of furniture industries in Iran. Tehran: Trade Promotion Organization of Iran. (In Persian)
[2] Jalali, S. and Karami, M., 2019. Lifestyle changes and their impact on urban furniture demand in Iran. Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 24(3), pp.95–112. (In Persian)
[3] Ebrahimi, K., 2016. Non-oil exports and the role of SMEs in sustainable development. Tehran: Institute for Trade Studies and Research. (In Persian)
[4] Mousavi, R. and Noori, H., 2018. The role of innovation in developing Iran's furniture industry. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 7(2), pp.70–85. (In Persian)
[5] CSIL (Centre for Industrial Studies), 2022. World furniture outlook 2022–2025. Milan: CSIL.
[6] International Trade Centre (ITC), 2021. Global report on the furniture industry. Geneva: UNCTAD-WTO.
[7] Yousefi, M., 2020. Competitiveness analysis of Iran’s furniture industry using export performance indicators. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 21(4), pp.49–67. (In Persian)
[8] Tehran Chamber of Commerce, 2021. Analytical report on the furniture industry of Tehran Province. Tehran: Center for Economic Statistics. (In Persian)
[9] Rezaei, H. and Sadri, N., 2019. Supply chain challenges in Tehran's furniture industry. Journal of Production and Operations Management, 10(1), pp.104–121. (In Persian)
[10] Porter, M. E., 2008. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Simon & Schuster.
[11] Rahimi, E. and Salari, B., 2021. Application of Porter’s model in strategic analysis of small industries. Strategic Management Quarterly, 15(3), pp.117–132. (In Persian)
[12] Zanjani, A., Hosseini, A. and Khosravi, M., 2019. Application of Porter’s competitive forces model in Iran’s furniture industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 11(4), pp.71–88. (In Persian)
[13] Tajik, F., 2018. Reasons for the decline in competitive advantage in Iranian furniture design. Journal of Art and Industrial Design, 4(2), pp.45–59. (In Persian)
[14] Ahmadi, R. and Hosseini, L., 2020. The impact of imports on the competitiveness of domestic furniture producers. Iranian Journal of Industrial Economics, 6(1), pp.60–75. (In Persian)
[15] Habibi, A., Sarafrazi, A., and Izadyar, S., 2014. Delphi Technique Theoretical Framework in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(4), pp.8–13.
[16] Rezaeian, M., 2018. Research Methods in Management. Tehran: SAMT Publications. (In Persian)
[17] Arabzouzani, M., Hosseini Pour, S. and Baygi, F., 2014. Understanding Cronbach's alpha: A necessity for conducting valid research. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 14(9), pp.831–832. (In Persian)
[18] Jamshidi, M., Abbasi, M.R. and Zarei, E., 2015. Analysis of competitive structure in Iran’s sportswear industry using Porter’s five forces model. Strategic Policy Research Journal, 5(17), pp.75–94. (In Persian)
[19] Wellner, S. and Lakotta, R., 2020. Barriers to entry and market dynamics in the German railway
industry: A Porter’s five forces analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 54(2), pp.210–229.
[20] Nikravesh, R., Kheyrandish, R., Ghorbani Vaghei, H., and Rahchamani, R., 2016. Competitive market analysis of edible nanoclay based on Porter’s model. In: 2nd National Conference on Iran’s Macroeconomics, Gonbad Kavous University. (In Persian)
[21] Boafo, N.D., Kraa, J.J. and Webu, C.G., 2018. Porter’s five forces impact on the performance of companies in the banking industry in Ghana. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 6(8), pp.14–28.
[22] Borja, M. and Marginean, S., 2014. Consumer preferences in the Romanian furniture market: Between tradition and functionality. Journal of Furniture Economics and Design, 10(2), pp.33–45.
[23] Fill, T., Novak, P. and Klein, M., 2016. Market behavior of customers in small-scale furniture enterprises: Urban demand for practical and affordable design. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 26(4), pp.412–428.
[24] Iranian Furniture Producers and Sellers Union, 2022. Industry Report: Status of furniture production units in Iran. Tehran: IFPSU Publications. (In Persian)
[25] Bustamante, J., Morales, C. and Lema, A., 2024. Supplier dynamics and bargaining power in Ecuador's furniture sector. Latin American Journal of Industrial Economics, 12(1), pp.22–39.
[26] Hosseini, M. and Roozbehaneh, M., 2011. The role of supplier power in Iran’s petrochemical industry: An industrial structure analysis. Iranian Journal of Energy and Industry Studies, 4(2), pp.77–93. (In Persian)
[27] López, J., Morales, F. and Ruiz, C., 2022. Market openness and product quality in small-scale manufacturing: Evidence from Latin America. Journal of Industrial Development, 8(3), pp.101–119.
[28] Kawakita, Y. and Hoque, M.E., 2023. Barriers to competitiveness in emerging furniture industries: The role of technology and innovation. Asian Journal of Industrial Economics, 15(1), pp.55–72.
[29] Mohammadrabei, M., Rezaei, S., and Naseri, F., 2016. The role of brand performance and market control in the success of Iranian furniture companies: Emphasizing brand management capabilities. Journal of Modern Marketing Research, 6(2), pp.219–236.
[30] Porter, M. E., 2008. The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78–93.