Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Industries

Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Industries

Performance of sound absorption coefficient and sound transmission loss index in lightweight polymeric gypsum fiberboards with writing waste paper fibers

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Wood and Paper Science and Industry, Faculty of Natural Resources, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran
2 Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
10.22034/ijwp.2025.2066405.1714
Abstract
Objectives: Problem definition and objectives: One of the important challenges in improving the quality of gypsum panels is to improve their acoustic properties by lightening them, such as using waste paper fibers, and optimizing the sound absorption and transmission loss of these types of lightened panels can be evaluated. In this study, the acoustic performance of gypsum board panels reinforced with recycled writing waste paper fibers and enhanced with selected polymer additives was investigated. The main aim was to improve sound absorption and sound insulation in these panels.
Methodology: For this purpose, three types of samples were prepared: gypsum board, fiber-reinforced gypsum board (gypsum fiberboard), and fiber-reinforced gypsum board with additives such as polyvinyl alcohol, modified hydrated lime, and cement (polymeric gypsum fiberboard). Sound absorption tests were conducted according to ISO 10534-2 and ASTM E1050 standards using the transfer function method and impedance tube to measure the sound absorption coefficient. Sound insulation was tested based on ASTM E2611-09 to measure the sound transmission loss index. To cover the full frequency spectrum in acoustic testing, 10 cm diameter samples were used for low-frequency ranges (63–500 Hz), and 3 cm diameter samples for higher frequency ranges (630–6300 Hz).
Results: The sound absorption results showed that the polymeric gypsum fiberboard had the best performance up to 4000 Hz compared to the other panels. The fiber-reinforced gypsum panel also outperformed the gypsum board. Both gypsum fiberboard types were slightly better than gypsum board and were classified in the low sound absorption category (Grade E). However, all three samples showed poor performance in low frequencies (around 250 Hz) and mid-range frequencies (500–1000 Hz), while they performed better at high frequencies (2000–4000 Hz), particularly the polymer or fiber-reinforced panels. The highest sound absorption coefficient was achieved by the polymeric gypsum fiberboard, reaching approximately 0.58 at 3150 Hz, followed by the gypsum fiberboard (0.46 at 4000 Hz) and gypsum board (0.44 at 4000 Hz). The matrix formed by the combination of additives, gypsum, and fibers in the polymeric gypsum fiberboard created porosity, improving sound absorption. In terms of sound transmission loss index, both the gypsum fiberboard and polymeric gypsum fiberboard performed better at base frequencies compared to the gypsum board. Interestingly, the gypsum fiberboard outperformed the polymeric gypsum fiberboard in sound insulation. The sound transmission loss index of the polymeric gypsum fiberbard up to 4000 Hz was lower than the gypsum fiberboard but higher than the gypsum board, with sound transmission reduction reaching up to 28 dB. The sound transmission loss index response of the gypsum board peaked at approximately 33 dB in the 4000–6000 Hz range. The gypsum fiberboard exhibited a more uniform sound transmission loss across all frequency ranges, providing sound insulation up to approximately 37 dB. The polymeric gypsum fiberboard showed moderate performance compared to the other two types.
Conclusion: Generally, all samples demonstrated weak performance below 1000 Hz, with sound insulation below 10 dB, while their best performance was in the mid-frequency range (2000–6000 Hz). Their effectiveness declined above 6000 Hz. Sound insulation graphs indicated that both the gypsum fiberboard and polymeric gypsum fiberboard had a positive effect on the sound transmission loss index. According to the Noise preference measurement charts (based on standard 8834-1) for indoor noise measurement, the gypsum board was rated at 15, while the gypsum fiberboard and polymeric gypsum fiberboard were rated at 20. The porous texture of the polymeric gypsum fiberboard enhanced sound absorption, and the flexible structure of the fiber-reinforced gypsum panel contributed to improved sound insulation. Thus, gypsum fiberboard or polymeric gypsum fiberbard, along with layers of other materials, has the potential for acoustic applications. Gypsum boards reinforced with fibers and polymer additives are used in the production of lightweight, durable, fast-setting, and environmentally friendly building materials and are mainly used in partition walls, false ceilings, wall coverings, and high-rise construction projects.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Pecas, P., Carvalho, H., Salman, H., and Leite, M., 2018. Natural fibre composites and their applications: a review. Journal of Composites Science, 2(4), 66. doi.org/10.3390/jcs2040066. 
[2] Elwaleed, A. K., Nikabdullah, N., Nor, M. J. M., Tahir, M. F. M., Nuawi, M. Z., and Abakr, Y. A., 2014. Experimental study on the effect of compression on the sound absorption of date palm fibers. World Applied Sciences Journal, 31(ARSEM)), pp. 40-44.
[3] Cornaro, C., and Buratti, C., 2020. Energy efficiency in buildings and innovative materials for building construction. Applied Sciences, 10(8), 2866.
[4] I.N.S.O, (5032), 2014. Gypsum - Gypsum Concrete- Specifications, Iranian National Standardization Organization, ICS, 91.100.10, ICS, 91.100.10. (In Persian).
[5]  I.N.S.O, (2786), 2013. Gypsum - Gypsum Blocks Definitions, Requirements and Test Methods. Iranian National Standardization Organization. ICS, 91.100.10. (In Persian).
[6] Construction industry - Law and legislation - Iran.  2017.  Architectural acoustics – Soundproofing - Architectural acoustics Standards. Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center. ISBN: 978-600-113-167-7. (In Persian).
[7] Cavanaugh, W. J., Tocci, G. C., and Wilkes, J. A., 2009. Architectural acoustics: Principles and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
[8] Ohadi Hamedani, A., and Hassani Bagherani, A. A. 2021. Porous Sound-Absorbing Materials – Part II: Sound Absorption Mechanisms and Modeling, Scientific Journal of Acoustics and Vibration. 10(20), pp. 3-23. (In Persian).
[9] Perivoitos, P., Heidemann, L., Weinhold, J., and Zeitler, B., 2025. Improving Sound Insulation in Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) Wall Assemblies: A Systematic Investigation. DAS|DAGA 2025 Copenhagen, pp. 340-343.
[10] Edalat, H.R., Najafi Amiri, A., Tabarsa, T. and Madhooshi, M. 2020. Investigation on the influence of raw material type on properties of ligno-cellulosic green insulation composite. Journal of Wood and Forest Science and Technology Research, 27(3), pp. 73-91. (In Persian).
[11] Najim, T.S., Al-Zubaidy, A.A., and Yassin, S. A., 2011. Physical and mechanical properties of polymer-gypsum composite. In: Proceedings of First Polymers/Composites Symposium, May 5-6 Al-Mustansiria University, Baghdad, Iraq, pp. 1-13.
[12] Gomes, C.E.M., Sousa, A.K.D., Araujo, M.E.S.O., Ferreira, S.B., and Fontanini, P., 2019. Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of Redispersible Polymer-Gypsum Composites. Materials Research, 22(3), e20180119.
[13] Doost, A., Bayat Kashkoli, A., and Farrokh-Payam, S., R., 2025. Improving the Performance of Polymer-Based Gypsum Board Using Waste Office Paper Fibers: Analysis of Physical and Mechanical Properties, Journal of Forest and Wood Products, 77(4), pp. 377-390. (In Persian).
[14] I.N.S.O, (14478-2), 2013. Gypsum - Gypsum board with fibrous reinforcement definitions requirements and test methods, Part 2, Gypsum fiber board. Iranian National Standardization Organization. ICS, 91.100.10. (In Persian).
[15] ISO (10534-2. 1998. Determination of sound absorption coefficient and impedance in impedance tubes, Part 1: Transfer-function method. ISO 10534-2. International Standardization Organization, 11-15.
[16] A.S.T.M-E1050-10: 2010. Standard Test Method for Impedance and Absorption of Acoustical Materials Using a Tube, Two Microphones and a Digital Frequency Analysis System. ASTM international.
[17] A.S.T.M-E2611-09. 2009. Measurement of Normal Incidence Sound Transmission of Acoustical Materials Based on the Transfer Matrix Method. ASTM international.
[18] ISIRI (8184). 2005. Acoustics – Sound absorbers for use in buildings – Rating of sound absorption. Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran.
[19] I.S.O. (11654). Acoustics - Sound absorbers for use in buildings - Rating of sound absorption.  International Standardization Organization.
[20] I.N.S.O, (8834-1), 2018. Acoustics - Rating of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements - Part 1: Airborne sound insulation. Iranian National Standardization Organization. ICS, 91.120.20. (In Persian).
[21] Arjunan, A., Baroutaji, A., Robinson, J., Vance, A., and Arafat, A., 2024.  Acoustic metamaterials for sound absorption and insulation in buildings. Building and Environment, 251, 111250.
[22] Mania, P., Flach, A., and Pilarska, M.. 2023. Sound wave absorption coefficient and sound velocity in thermally modified wood. Applied sciences, 13, 8136. doi.10.3390/app13148136.
[23] Ismail, F. Z., Rahmat, M. N., Mohd Yussof, F. N., and Mohammad Noor, M. A. F., 2014. April. Sustainable absorption panels from agricultural waste. Research Innovation Business Unit, Innovation and design exposition (Conference 2014). 15,1-8. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20141501035.
[24] Guna, V., Yadav, C., Maithri, B. R., Ilangovan, M., Touchaleaume, F., Saulnier, B., ... and Reddy, N. 2021. Wool and coir fiber reinforced gypsum ceiling
tiles with enhanced stability and acoustic and thermal resistance. Journal of Building Engineering, 41, 102433.
[25] Dusthoseini K., and Elyasi, A., 2012. Study on the possibility of using bagasse in manufacture of sound-proof Particleboard. Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Industries,(3)1, PP. 43-52. (In Persian).
[26] Poudinehpour M., Ebrahimi Gh., Tajvidi M., Charmahali M. and Ramtin A.,  2006. The effects of two kinds of agricultural wastes (wheat and barely straws) on nrc% of aspen particleboards. Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Science Research , (21)2, PP. 61-69. (In Persian).
[27] Taiwo, E. M., Yahya, K. B., Haron, Z., Dare, G. M., and Sunday, A., 2023. Acoustic characterization of composites made of gypsum and pineapple leaf fibres. American Journal of IR 4.0 and Beyond, 2(2), 30-38. DOI:10.54536/ajirb.v2i2.1802.