Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Industries

Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Industries

Comparing the effect of cell wall modification with glycidyl methacrylate and maleic anhydride on the physical, mechanical and biological properties of poplar wood-styrene polymer composite

Document Type : Research Paper

Author
Tarbiat Modares university
Abstract
Wood modification with cell wall modifiers change the practical properties of wood. Likely, changing the modification conditions with chemicals by different reactivity has a more favorable effect on wood properties. This research was conducted to determine the effect of cell wall modification with glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and maleic anhydride (MA) on practical properties of wood polymer composite. Test samples were divided into ten groups; control, impregnated with styrene, and combined modification of cell wall (GMA and MA) at four concentrations of 10, 20, 30 and 40%/styrene. Cell wall modification, with increase in weight and conversion rate, improved hydrophobicity and dimensional stability of specimens which for GMA was more than MA. With increasing of the GMA concentration from 30 to 40% and cell wall bulking, cracks probably formed in the cell wall that increased water uptake and dimensional changes. The presence of monomer along with modification, by reducing the polarity of wood, uniform distribution of monomer in wood, and improving the adhesion between polymer and wood, increased the mechanical properties of composites, which showed the highest improvement in GMA/styrene. Modification with MA and GMA prevented the fungi mycelium development through reducing hydroxyl groups, changing the hollocellulose structure, and the presence of polymer as a physical barrier. The effect of GMA combined with monomer created more improvement on biological resistance up to 20% concentration, and by increasing the concentration to 40%, it did not show a significant difference with MA. The mechanical properties improvement can be attributed to the formation of polymers with excellent performance and the effect of modification on the cell walls. In most properties, the effect of GMA up to 20% concentration was more than MA, but with increasing concentration and possibly the appearance of cracks in the cell wall, the efficiency of MA modification was higher than GMA.
Keywords

[1] Saiful Islam, MD., Hamdan, S., Hasan, M., Ahmed, A.S. and Rahman, M.R., 2012. Effect of coulling on the mechanical and biological properties of tropical wood polymer composites (WPC). International Biodeteriortion & Biodegradation, 72: 108-113.
[2] Ghorbani, M., Nikkhah Shahmirzadi, A., and Amininasab, S.M., 2017. Physical and Morphological Properties of Combined Treated Wood Polymer Composites by Maleic Anhydride and Methyl Methacrylate. Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology, 37:443–450.
[3] Ghorbani, M., Poorzahed, N., and Amininasab, S.M., 2020. Morphological, physical, and mechanical properties of silanized wood-polymer composite. Journal of composite materials, 54(11) 1403–1412.
[4] Li, Y.F., Liu, Y.X., Wang, X.M., Wu, Q.L., Yu, H.P. and Li, J. 2010a. Wood-polymer Composites prepared by the in situ polymerization of monomers within wood. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 119(6):3207-3216.
[5] Das, O., Sarmah, A.K. and Bhattacharyya, 2015. A sustainable and resilient approach through biochar addition in wood polymer composites. Science of the Total Environment. 512-513: 326-336.
[6] Devi, R.R., Ali, I., and Maji, T.K., 2008. Chemical modification of rubber wood with styrene and glycidyl methacrylate. Polymer Composites, 10.1002/pc.20423.
[7] Ghorbani, M., Asghari Aghmashadi, Z., Amininasab, S.M., Abedini, R., 2019a. Effect of different coupling agents on chemical structure and physical properties of vinyl acetate/wood polymer composites, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, DOI: 10.1002/APP.47467.
[8] Ghorbani, M., Asghari Aghmashadi, Z., Amininasab, S.M., Abedini, R., 2019b. Effect of different coupling agents on thermal, mechanical and biological behavior of vinyl acetate-wood polymer composite, Holzforschung, DOI:10.1515/hf-2018-0175.
[9] Feist, W.C., Rowell, R.M., and Ellis, W.D., 1989. Moisture sorption and accelerated weathering of acetylated and methacrylated aspen. Wood and Fiber Science, 23(1): 128-136.
[10] Devi, R.R and Maji, T.K., 2007. Effect of glycidyl methacrylate on the physical properties of wood polymer composites. Polymer Composites, (28), 10. 1002/pc, 1-5.
[11] Panov, D. and Terziev, N., 2009. Study on some alkoxysilanes used for hydrophobation and protection of wood against decay. International Biodeterioration& Biodegradation, 63:456-46.
[12] Yildiz, U.C., Yildiz, S.G. and Gezer, E.D., 2005. Mechanical properties and decay resistance of wood–polymer composites prepared from fast growing species in Turkey. Bioresource Technology, 96:1003-1011.
[13] Jani, M., Rozman, D., and Rahim, S., 2007. Rubber wood-polymer Composites: The Effect of Chemical Impregnation on the Mechanical and Physical Properties. Malaysian Polymer Journal, 2(2): 1-11.
[14] Li Y., Liu Z., Dong X., Fu Y. and Liu Y., 2013. Comparison of decay resistance of wood and wood polymer composite prepared by in- suit polymerization of monomers. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 84:401-406.
[15] Rowell, R.M., Ibach, R.E., McSweeny, R.E. and Nilsson, T., 2009. Understanding decay resistance, dimensional stability and strength changes in heat treated and acetylated wood.Wood Material Science & Engineering, 1-2(4): 14-22.
[16] Baysal, E., Yalinkilic, M.K., Altinok M., Sonmez A., Peker H., and Colak M., 2007. Some physical, biological, mechanical, and fire properties of wood polymer composite (WPC) pretreated with boric acid and borax mixture. Construction and Building Materials, 21(9): 1879-1885.
[17] Mattos, B., Serrano, L., Gatto, D., Magalhaes, W.L.E., and Labidi, J., 2014. Thermochemical and hygroscopicity properties of pinewood treated by in situ copolymerisation with methacrylate monomers. Thermochimica Acta, 596: 70- 78