Life cycle assessment of SMF and GMF Fluting paper production process

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Wood and Paper Science Department, Faculty of Natural Resources, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resource University Sari, Iran

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

3 sari agricultural and natural resources university

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the environmental effects of SMF and GMF fluting paper production of Mazandaran Wood and Paper industries using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. Statistics and information required for this research were obtained through interviews with engineers and experts of the industries. The findings show that in section on the Life cycle inventory (LCI), the amount of water consumed and the emission of carbon dioxide have a greater share than other materials. Also, by examining the intermediate indices, it was found that among 15 groups of effects (carcinogenicity, non-carcinogenicity, mineral respiration, ionizing radiation, ozone depletion, organic respiration, aquatic toxicity, soil toxicity, soil acid/nutrient, occupation Earth, aquatic acidification, swamping, global warming, non-renewable energy and mineral extraction (aquatic toxicity category and non-renewable energy index) have the largest share. Findings from the assessment of damage in four categories of damage (human health, ecosystem quality, climate change and resources) show that the share of SMF fluting paper 155.08 percent and the share of GMF fluting paper 100 percent and the share Each is weighted in SMF 0.81pt and GMF 0.67pt. Also cumulative exergy demand in SMF fluting paper 38864.9 MJ and in GMF fluting paper 25873.53 MJ and the share of each in percentage in SMF fluting paper 150.21 percent and in GMF fluting paper 100 percent. The results showed that the production of GMF fluting paper has less environmental effects on the environment than the production of SMF fluting paper.

Keywords


[1 [Tajaldini, A. and Roohnia, M., 2008. Investigation and prediction on fluting paper supply & demand in Iran. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Iranian Wood and Paper Sciences Research Iranian. 23(2):123-135. (In persian)
]2[ Ebrahimi-Barisa, R. and Tavakoli, H., 2013. Environmental pollutants in pulp and paper industries and methods of their control. Second National Conference on Planning and Environmental Protection, 15 August, Hamedan, Iran,15 p. (In persian)
]3 [Karimi Organi, F. and Motaghi, S.H., 2009. Investigation of pollution caused by effluent of Mazandaran wood and paper factory. The third specialized conference and exhibition of environmental engineering, October, Tehran, Iran, 10p. (In persian)
]4[ Rafighi, A., Bayat Kashkooli, A. Vali, M. and Azizi, M., 2014. Determining and evaluating the effective criteria in the optimal location of flutation paper production plant from agricultural waste in Golestan province. Journal of Wood and Forest Science and Technology, 21(1): 137-148. (Inpersian)
]5[ Naderi, M. and Salari Baghoonabad, M., 2013. Investigation of power generation technologies with the approach of reducing greenhouse gas emissions with the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) technique. The first national conference on new and clean energies, Hamedan, Iran, 15p. (Inpersian)
]6 [Azapagic, A., 1999. Life cycle assessment and its application to process selection, design and optimization. Chemical Engineering Journal, 73: 1-21.
]7 [Tong, R., Zhai, Y. and Li, X., 2015. An LCA-based health damage evaluation method for coal mine dust. Veterinary Clinical Pathology: A Case-Based Approach, 223-230.
]8 [Curran, M. A., (Ed.). 2016. Goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment. Springer. Germany.181 p.
]9[ Abbasi, H., Zarea-Hosseinabadi, H. and Mousazadeh, H., 2016. Assessing the environmental impacts of the comfort furniture production process using life cycle assessment techniques. Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Industries,7(3): 475-485. (Inpersian)
]10 [Pant, R., Van Hoof, G. Schowanek, D. Feijtel, T.C. de Koning, A.  Hauschild, M. and R. Rosenbaum, R., 2004. Comparison between three different LCIA methods for aquatic ecotoxicity and a product environmental risk assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9(5): 295-306.
]11[ Guinée, J., Gorree, M. Heijungs, R. Huppes, G. Kleijn, Udo de Haes, H. Van der Voet, E. and Wrisberg, M., 2002. Life Cycle Assessment. An operational guide to ISO standards. Volume 1, 2, 3. Centre of Environmental Science, Leiden University (CML), the Netherlands.Hong, J. and Li, X. 2012. Environmental assessment of recycled printing and writing paper: A case study in China. Waste Management, 32: 264-270.
]12[ Jolliet, O., Margni, M. Charles, R. Humbert, S. Payet, J. Rebitzer, G. and Rosenbaum, R., 2016. IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8(6): 324-330.
]13[ Kermanian, H., Razmpur, Z. Ramezani, O. and Rahmani nia, m., 2010. Evaluation of water consumption reduction strategies in a set of packaging paper recycling factories in Iran. Environmental Sciences, 8(1): 115-133. (Inpersian)
]14 [Vaseghi, E. and Esmaili, A., 2009. Investigating the Determinants of CO2 Emissions in Iran (Application of Kuznets Environmental Theory), environment College, Ecology, Tehran, 35(52): 99-110. (Inpersian)
]15 [Mbohwa, C.T. and Mashoko, L., 2007. Application of Life Cycle Assessment in the Zimbabwean Pulp and Paper industry.6P.
]16[ Silva, D. A. L., Pavan, A.L.R. de Oliveira, J.A. and Ometto, A.R., 2015. Life cycle assessment of offset paper production in Brazil: hotspots and cleaner production alternatives. Journal of Cleaner Production. 93:222–233.
]17[ Hong, J. and Li, X., 2012.  Environmental assessment of recycled printing and writing paper: A case study in China. Waste Management. 32: 264-270.
]18 [Kouchaki-Penchah, H., Sharifi, M. Mousazadeh, H. Zarea-Hosseinabadi, H. and Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., 2016a. Gate to gate life cycle assessment of flat pressed particleboard production in Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112: 343-350.