Evaluation and comparision of mechanical and barrier properties of stone paper and gloss paper

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Prof., Department of pulp and paper industry, Gorgan university of agricultural sciences and natural resources,Gorgan, Iran

2 Ph.D Student, Department of pulp and paper industry, Gorgan University of agricultural sciences and natural resources, Gorgan, Irann

Abstract

Paper is one of the main packaging materials that can protect the product from damage without sacrificing its quality while being flexible, degradable, recyclable, and printable. Recently, a new generation of materials with the name of the stone paper has entered the market that one of its uses is in packaging. In this paper, the mechanical, barrier and optical properties of this type of paper are evaluated and compared with gloss paper, which is a high-quality type of cellulose fiber paper. The results showed that stone paper is almost impermeable in barrier properties such as water vapor transmission rate, oil passage and water absorption. Comparison of optical properties indicated that the stone paper is less transparent than gloss paper and paperboard, but it is more transparent. The tear strength and elongation of stone paper is more than glossy paper and paperboard. However, the tensile strength and burst strength of gloss paper and paperboard is more than stone paper.

Keywords


[1] Keymannesh, Sh. 2012. Importance and role of packaging in export development. Iran trade development organization. 7p. (In Persian).
[2] Marsh, K. and Bugusu, B., 2007. Food Packaging—Roles, Materials, and Environmental Issues. Journal of Food Science, 72(3): 39-56.
[3] Raheem, D., 2012. Application of plastics and paper as food packaging materials – An overview. Journal of Food and Agriculture. 25(3):177-188.
[4] Koshy, R. R., Mary, S. K., Thomas, S. and Pothan, L. A., 2015. Environment friendly green composites based on soy protein isolate–A review. Food Hydrocolloids, 50:174-192.
[5] Khwaldia, K., Arab‐Tehrany, E. and Desobry, S., 2010. Biopolymer coatings on paper packaging materials. Comprehensive Reviews in food science and food safety, 9(1): 82-91.
[6] Netramai, S. and Kijchavengkul, T., 2016. Use of Paper in Food Packaging Applications. Reference Module in Food Sciences, Edition: 1st, Publisher: Elsevier.
[7] Herrera, M. A., Mathew A. P. and Oksman K., 2017. Barrier and mechanical properties of plasticized and cross-linked nanocellulose coatings for paper packaging applications. Journal of Cellulose, 24(9), 3969-3980.
[8] Report Buyer Ltd, 2014. Food Packaging Market by Material (Paper & Board, Plastic, Glass, Metal), Type (Rigid, Semi-rigid, Flexible), Application (Dairy, Bakery, Confectionery,
Convenience Foods, Fruits, Vegetables, Meat, Sauces, Dressings) – Global Trends & Forecast to 2019. Report Buyer Ltd, Kent, United Kingdom.
[9] Ottenio, D., Escabasse, J.-Y. and Podd, B., 2004. ILSI Europe Report Series: Packaging Materials: [6] Paper and Board for Food Packaging Applications. International Life Sciences Institute, Brussels, Belgium. Available from: http://www.ilsi.org/Europe/Publications/R2004Pac_Mat.pdf.
[10] Twede, D. and Selke, S.E.M., 2005. Cartons, Crates and Corrugated Board: Handbook of Paper and Wood Packaging Technology. DEStech Publications, Inc. 584p.
[11] Hosseinkhanli, H., Aalaie, J., Abdollahi, M., Khalkhali, T. and Shojaei, M., 2014. Thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties of polyethylene/surlyn/organoclay nanocomposites blown films prepared by different mixing methods. Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology, 21(1):60-69.
[12] Liu, R., Tang, C. and Liu, H., 2015. Cellulose Nanofiber-Protein Composite Handbook of Polymer Nanocomposites. Processing, Performance and Application, (pp. 449-464): Springer.
[13] Lavoine, N., Desloges, I., Khelifi, B. and Bras, J., 2014. Impact of different coating processes of microfibrillated cellulose on the mechanical and barrier properties of paper. Journal of Materials Science, 49(7), 2879-2893.
[14] Afrabandpay, E., 2003. Properties of paper : an introduction. Agriculture science publication. Tehran, 392p. (In Persian).
[15] Rhim, J.-W., Lee, J.-H. and Hong, S. I., 2006. Water resistance and mechanical properties of biopolymer (alginate and soy protein) coated paperboards. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 39(7): 806-813.
[16] Ebrahimpour Kasmani, J., Samariha, A. and Nemati M., 2014. Effect of mixing different contents of OCC pulp on NSSC pulp strength. Journal of BioResource, 9(3):5480-5487.