Production of zein, chitosan, nanocellulose Nanocomposite , dynamic analysis and glass transition temperature

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D student., Department of wood and paper science and technology, Faculty of natural resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

2 Prof., Department of wood and paper science and technology, Faculty of natural resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

3 Assistant Prof., Department of wood and paper science and technology, Faculty of natural resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

The vast accumulation of materials and synthetic polymers, which can remain as contaminants in the environment and cannot be decomposed for a long time, is one of the problems in the plastic industry. The present study shows how synthetic polymers are replaced by natural ones through semi-industrial production method. Firstly, a masterbatch was prepared by mixing zein, nanocellulose and chitosan in a ratio of 3: 2: 5. A solution of chitosan and zein was prepared. Then nanocellulose was added to the suspension and the ternary mixture and composite was prepared. Then the masterbatch was dried and grinded and films were prepared by adding zein matrix in 1, 3 and 5 percent nanocellulose to 1.5 and 4.5 and 7.5 percent of chitosan by extruding and pressing. Storage and loss modulus and loss factor of the treatments were studied out by (assessing) Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) / Dynamic Mechanical Thermal Analysis (DMTA). It was observed that thermal properties was improved by increasing nanocellulose and chitosan to 3 and 4.5 percent, respectively. The glass transition temperature in this treatment was 88.3 °C. It was higher, in comparison with 5 and 1 percent nanocellulose and pure zein treatments, which were 85.6, 79.01 and 64.9, respectively. The peak of loss factor or the glass transition temperature of composites depends on the distribution of nanocellulose and better interaction of nanocellulose and chitosan and zein matrix. The glass transition temperature decreased in more and less than 3 percent nanocellulose that shows its lower thermal properties.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Javadzadeh, Gh., 2010. Paper and paperboard packaging, 1 ed., Daneshpazir publications, Tehran, Iran, 285 pp. (In Persian).
[2] Siracusa, V., Rocculi, P., Romani, S. and Dalla Rosa, M., 2008. Biodegradable polymers for food packaging: a review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19(12): 634-643.
[3] Rhim, J.W., 2007. Natural biopolymer-based nanocomposite films for packaging applications. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 47(4): 411-433.
[4] Jonoobi. M., Rahamin, H. and rafieyan, F.,2015. Cellulose nanocrystal properties and their applications. Iranian Journal of wood and paper industries, 6(1):167-192. (In Persian).
[5] Gordon, W.S. and Kelly, D.U., 2013. Effect of multiple extrusion passes on zein. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 98(1):184-189.
[6] Mortazavian, S.A.M., Azizi, M.H. and Sohrabvandi, S., 2010. Edible films: indicators of quality and production methods. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 7(4), 117-107. (In Persian).
[7] Reddy, N. and Yang, Y., 2011. Novel green composites using zein as matrix and jute fibers as reinforcement. Biomass and Bio Energy, 35(1):3496–3503.
[8] Zhang, Y., Rempel, C. and Mclaren, D., 2014. Edible Coating and Film Materials: Carbohydrates. Innovations in Food Packaging (Second Edition). Elsevier: London, UK, pp. 305–323.
[9] Jonoobi, M., Oladi, R., Davoudpour, Y., Oksman, K., Dufresne, A., Hamzeh, Y. and Davoodi, R., 2015. Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review. Cellulose, 22(2):935-969.
[10] Cheng, S.Y., B.J. Wang. and Weng, Y.M., 2015. Antioxidant and antimicrobial edible zein/chitosan composite films fabricated by incorporation of phenolic compounds and dicarboxylic acids. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 63(1), 115–121.