Investigating the Effective Index on Customers Choice in Buying Furniture

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

The competitive world today, with increasing customers satisfaction and expanding the definition of hosting and its direct connection with quality of products is essential. Thus not only the current customers stay fixed but also it increases. The purpose of this study was to investigate and ranking the crucial indicators that influence the choice of furniture by customers. Because of this, the studied indexes are classified in 6 group: quality, beauty, design, creating a suitable atmosphere for selling the goods, selling conditions and advertising. Population consisted of three major commercial areas in Tehran (Delawaran, Hassan Abad and Yaftabad). Statistical sample consisted a number of 100 people. A questionnaire was developed to gather data. Reliability of the questionnaires has been approved through Cronbach's Alpha coefficient (0.921). Investigation of effective indexes was done by chi-square method and in order to final ranking the indexes, friedman analyses have been used. The results obtained of ranking showed the chief factor in customers choice is under category of beauty due to this elegancy role in customers point of view. After elegancy, according to the classified elements studied in this research, raw material in making furniture, wood production’s price, ergonomy, customers satisfaction for his last purchase and immediate delivery, respectively, are the most important effective index in buying furniture by consumer.

Keywords


[1]      Tajdini, A., Rabie, D., Jahan Latibari, A. and Pourmousa, SH., 2011. Study on effective indexes on exports of wooden furniture in Iran, Journal of science and techniques in natural resources 6: 71-87. (In Persian).
[2]      Wan, Z. and Bullard, S.H., 2008. Firm size and competitive advantage in the U.S. upholstered, wood household furniture industry, Forest Products Journal 58: 91–96.
[3]      Grant Thornton, L.L.P., 2006. Survey of U.S. Business Leaders, 12th edition. Grant Thornton International, Chicago, IL, 16pp.
[4]      Huyett, W.I. and Viguerie, S.P., 2005. Extreme competition, The McKinsey Quarterly Number 1: 46–57.
[5]      Hart, C.W.L., 1995. Mass customization: conceptual underpinnings, opportunities and limits, International Journal of ServiceIndustry Management 6: 36–45.
[6]      Lihra, T., Buehlmann, U. and Graf, R., 2012. Customer preferences for customized household furniture, Journal of Forest Economics 18: 94–112.
[7]      Järvinen, E., Toivonen, R. and Enroth, R.R., 2001. Competence and image of wood on the German building material markets. Pellervon taloudellinen tutkimuslaitos. 74p.
[8]      Kelly, A., O’Brien, K.A. and Teisl, M.F., 2004. Eco-information and its effect on consumer values for environmentally certified forest products, Journal of Forest Economics 10: 75–96.
[9]      Nemli, G., Hızıroglu, S., Serin, H., Akyu¨z, K.C., Akyu¨z, I. and Toksoy, D., 2007. A perspective from furniture and cabinet manufacturers in Turkey, Building and Environment 42: 1699–1706.
[10]  Fathollahzadeh, A., 2009. Standardization, a way to increase the quality of the wooden furniture manufacturing industry. The 2nd international conference on the world trade furniture, interior design. (In Persian)
[11]  Ng, B.K. and Kanagasundaram, T., 2011. Sectoral innovation systems in low-tech manufacturing: types, sources, drivers and barriers of innovation in Malaysia's wooden furniture industry, International Journal of Institutions and Economies 3: 549-574.
[12]  Ng, B.K. and Kanagasundaram, T., 2012. The dynamics of innovation in Malaysia's wooden furniture industry- Innovation actors and linkages, Forest Policy and Economics 14: 107–118.
[13]  Tu, Q., Vonderembse, M.A., and Ragu-Nathan, T.S., 2001. The impact of time-based manufacturing practices on mass customization and value to customer, Journal of Operations Management 19: 201–217.
[14]  Ladriere, J., 2001. The challenge: presented to cultures by science and technology. Translate, Sepordeh P.  Research institute of culture, art and communication. Tehran. 231 p. (In Persian).
[15]  McGann,J. 2004. Beauty, the irreal, and the willing assumption of disbelief, Journal of critical inquiry 30: 717-738.
[16]  Hajati Modaraee, S. and Jalalzadeh B., 2006. Defining aesthetic values in designing furniture for young families, Bagh-E-Nazar 3: 30-48. (In Persian).