Nondestructive evaluation of acoustical and mechanical properties of bagasse fiber composites by flexural vibration method (Lohe Sabz & Karoon factories)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

In this investigation, the potential of flexural vibration method as nondestructive tool was studied in order to evaluate the acoustical and the mechanical properties of bagasse composites. For this purpose, more than 40 cubic samples (36×4×1.6 cm3) were taken from the given materials. The results showed that the acoustical behavior of particle board were better than that measured for medium density fiber board. In MDF samples, the resonance frequency, the sound velocity, the quality factor as well as the acoustic coefficients were significantly lower than those measured in PB samples. In contrast, the internal friction measured in MDF was greater than values of PB. But no significant difference was observed of ACE in both MDF and PB samples. The young's modulus of MDF and PB were obtained by conducting a flexural vibration method under the free- free condition based on Timoshenko's vibration theory. The results were also compared with the modulus of elasticity and rupture calculated by 3 point bending test. The modulus of elasticity values, measured by dynamic method were 15% and 6% higher than those achieved by static bending method for MDF and PB respectively. It was also illustrated that the modulus of elasticity and the sound velocity were significantly positively related to the density of MDF and PB while the other acoustical properties had negative relations with density. As good correlations were found between dynamic and static modulus of elasticity (0.71) and also static modulus of rupture and dynamic modulus of elasticity (0.44), it can be drawn that the flexural vibration is valuable tool in order to evaluate mechanical properties of MDF made by bagasse while the same results were not observed in PB composites.

Keywords


[1] Atchison, J. and McGovern, G.N., 1978. History of paper and the importance of non-wood plant fibers, Pulp and paper manufacture: secondary fibers and non -wood pulping, volume 3, TAPPI Press, Atlanta GA, Chap 1.
[2] Alfonso, A. and Herryman, D., 1990. Pulping from agro-based resources. Holzforschung, 44:58–63.
[3] Bucur, V., 2006. Acoustics of wood, 2nd ed., Springer Series in Wood Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 393 p.
[4] Brancheriau, L., Baillères, H., Détienne, P., Gril, J. and Kronland, R., 2006. Key signal and wood anatomy parameters related to the acoustic quality of wood for xylophone-type percussion instruments. J Wood Sci, DOI 10.1007/s10086-005-0755-2.
[5] Vikram, V., Cherry, M.L., Briggs, D., Cress, D.W. and Howe, G.T., 2011. Stiffness of Douglas-Fir Lumber: effects of wood properties and genetics. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 41(6): 1160-1173.
[6] Bodig, J., 1989. Mechanics of wood and wood composites (Persian translation), University of Tehran Press, 680 p.
[7] Hunt, J.F., Zhang H., Guo, Z. and fu, F., 2013. Cantilever beam static and dynamic response comparison with mid-point bending of thin MDF composite panels. Bio Resources, 8(1):115-129.
[8] Yoshihara, H., 2011. Measurement of the young s modulus and shear Modulus of in-plane quasi-isotropic medium- density fiberboard by flexural vibration. BioResources, 6(4): 4871-4885.
[9] Yoshihara, H., 2012. Influence of the specimen depth to length ratio and lamination construction on young modulus and in-plane shear modulus of plywood measured by flexural vibration. BioResources, 7(1): 1337-1351.
[10] Niemz, L.J., Kucera, E. and Pohler, E., .1997. Vergeleichende untersuchungen zur bestimmmung des dynamischen E.mouls mittels schall-laufzeit-und resonans frequenzmessung. Holzforschung und Holzverwertung, 49(5): 91-93.
[11] Mirbolouk, P. and Roohnia, M., 2015. Evaluation of dynamic Modulus of elasticity of medium density fiberboard panel from longitudinal vibration tests on specimens. Bio Resources, 10(1):613-621.
[12] Hamdan, S., Talib, Z.A., Rahman, R.M., Ahmed, A.S. and SaifulIslam, A., .2010. Dynamic yang’s modulus measurement of treated and post- treated tropical wood polymer composites. Bio Resources, 5(1): 324-341.
[13] Yan, L., Chouw, N. and Jayaraman, K., 2014. On energy absorption capacity, flexural and dynamic properties of flax/epoxy composite tubes. Fibers and Polymers, 15 (6):1270-1277.
[14] Saiful islam, M.D., Hamdan, S., Abidin Talib, Z., Ahmed, A.S. and Rezaur Rahman, M.D., 2012. Tropical wood polymer nanocomposite (WPNC) the impact of nanoclay on dynamic mechanical thermal properties. Composites science and Technology, 72(26):1995-2001.
[15] Senthil Kumar, K., Siva, I., Jeyaraj, P., Winowlin Jappes, J.T., Amico, S.C. and Rajini, N., 2014. Synergy of fiber length and content on free vibration and damping Behavior of natural fiber reinforced polyester composite beams. Materials and Design, (56): 379–386.
[16] Roohnia M., 2007. NDT-LAB; System to evaluate the mechanical properties of wood. IR Patent 44032/22 08.
[17] Abdolahian Sohi, A., Khademi-Eslam., H., Hemasi, AH., Roohnia M. and Talaiepour, M., 2011. Nondestructive detection of the effect of drilling on acoustic performance of wood. Bio Resources: 6(3):2632-2646.
[18] Schwarze, F.R., Spycher, M. and Fink, S., 2008. Superior wood for violins – wood decay fungi as a substitute for cold climate.New Phytologist, 179:1095–1104.
[19] Tsoumis, G., 1991. Science and technology of wood. Van Nostrand Reinold, Wegst, UGK. Wood for Sound. American Journal of Botany, 93(10): 1439–1448.
[20] Roohnia, M. and Tajdini, A., 2007. Investigation on the possibility of modulus elasticity and damping factor measurements, I timbers from Arizona Cypress using free vibration NDT in comparison with static bending and forced vibration NDT. Majale Keshavarzi, 13(4):1017-1027.(In Persian).
[21] Hasegawa, M., Takata, M., Matsumura, J. and Oda, K., 2011. Effect of wood properties on within-tree variation in ultrasonic wave velocity in softwood. Ultrasonics, 51:296-302.
[22] Bucur, V. and Chivers, R.C., 1991. Acoustic properties and anisotropy of some Australian wood species. Acustica, 75:69–75.
[23] Mishiro, A., 1996. Effect of density on ultrasonic velocity in wood. Mokuzai Gakkaishi, 42 (9):887–894.
[24] Kazemi Najafi, S., Abbasi Marasht, A. and Ebrahimi, Gh., .2007. Prediction of ultrasonic wave velocity in particleboard and fiberboard. J Mater Sci, 42:789-793.